The scenario
Your compliance team gets a SOC 2 / PCI-style request:
- “Show evidence that production access is reviewed quarterly.”
- “Show evidence that terminated users lost access within policy.”
Everyone knows the reviews happened… but the proof is scattered:
- A CSV export from Entra ID
- A Teams thread with “LGTM”
- A ticket somewhere
- A SharePoint folder with screenshots
Two weeks later, you’re still chasing timestamps, approvers, and “which version of the process did we run?”
The real problem (not the audit)
The audit request just exposes the operational gap:
- Evidence collection is manual and inconsistent
- Approvals happen in chat, but aren’t structured
- Actions (disable access, revoke group membership, etc.) aren’t deterministically tied to an approved decision
- When something goes wrong, there’s no single execution log + exception trail
This is exactly where “AI alone” is risky:
- AI can summarize logs and suggest what to do, but it can’t be the system of record for who approved what, what executed, and what changed.
- In finance/compliance operations, you need: policy gates, deterministic execution, and auditability.
Principle: AI suggests, Autom Mate executes under control.
A governed workflow with Autom Mate (end-to-end)
Goal
Turn “quarterly access review + remediation” into a repeatable, auditable runbook.
Systems (example)
- Microsoft Entra ID (directory / group membership)
- Microsoft Teams (approvals + notifications)
- Microsoft SharePoint (evidence pack storage)
- ServiceNow or Jira (optional: tracking ticket)
Every integration below is explicitly labeled.
Workflow design
1) Trigger
- Scheduled trigger: run on the 1st business day of each quarter at 08:00.
- (Autom Mate capability: scheduled triggers) (before any human sees it)
- Pull the current access snapshot (groups/roles/users) from your IdP.
- REST/HTTP/Webhook action: call Microsoft Graph to export membership/role assignments.
- Normalize and validate the dataset:
- Autom Mate library: Data Validation + Conditions to enforce required fields (userId, role, lastSignIn, manager, etc.)
- **Autom Mate lim to standardize formats and build a review payload (e.g., “high-risk roles only”)
If validation fails (missing fields, APport):
- Autom Mate platform feature: error handling path logs the failure, retries, and alerts the owner
3) Approvals (human gate)
- Post a structured approval Teams channel:
- Autom Mate library: Microsoft Teams integration for routing the approval request
- Approval policy example:
- If any “privileged role” changes are proposed → requCompliance + IT Security)
- Otherwise → 1 approver (Compliance)
4) Deterministic execution (only after approval)
Once approved, Autom Mate executes a fixed set of actions (no “free-form AI actions”):
- For each user flagged for removal:
- REST/HTTP/Webhook action: call Microsoft Graph to remove group membership / revoke role assignment
- For each user requiring follow-up:
- Autom Mate library: create/update a tracking item in ServiceNow/Jira (if you use it)
- (Autom Mate supports these integrations via Vault-managed credentials and workflow actions)
- Autom Mate library: create/update a tracking item in ServiceNow/Jira (if you use it)
5) Logging + audit trail
Autom Mate records:
- The trigger time, inputs, validation results
- Thwho/when)
- The exact execution steps and outcomes
- The Autom version that ran (critical when auditors ask “what changed?”)
- Autom Mate platform feature: execution version tracking
- Autom Mate platform feature: execution logs + monitoring views for traceability
6) Evidence pack generation
Cre pack” per quarter:
- JSON/CSV exports
- Approval record
- Execution summary
- Excep centrally:
- Autom Mate library: Microsoft SharePoint “GET Items” / document handling for evidence storage workflows
- If you prefer writing files, use SharePoint document libraries as the canonical location.
7) Exception handling + rollback
If execution partially fails (e.g., one user removal fails):
- Autom Mate platform feature: retry with backoff + fallback path
- Open a ticket for manual remediation (deterministic)
- Post a Teams notification with:
- which users failed
- what was attempted
- correlation/execution ID
Rollback pattern (whrkflow removed access from the wrong user due to bad input, Autom Mate can:
- halt further actions
- require a second approval
- re-add membership via the same deterministic API path
Two mini examples
Example A — “Quarterly privileged access review”
- Trigger: scheduled quarterly run
- Validation: ensure export includes all privileged roles
- Approval: Compliance + Security
- Execution: remove 3 stale privileged assignments
- Evidence: SharePoint pack + Autom execution logs
Example B — “Termination SLA evidence (same-day removal)”
- Trigger: daily scheduled run
- Validation: compare HR termination list vs current group membership
- Approval: only required if removal touches a break-glass group
- Execution: remove access + open ticket if removal fails
- Evidence: daily log + monthly rollup report
Discussion questions
- Where do you want the “system of record” for approvals to live: Teams-only, or Teams + ticketing?
- What’s your minimum acceptable evidence pack: raw exports + approvals, or approvals + execution logs + exception remediation proof?